[Charlug] Re: new affiliation with PC3.org

[Sean Hogston]

Personally I am opposed to merging with any other group. The details of an
affiliation would have to be very clear for me to be onboard with that.
Especially since they are not a Linux LUG their direction may be greatly
different from ours. Having some type of relationship like we have with the
UNCC lug may be a better choice. We share info and cross post about events
etc but there is no real tie to them. Being the devil's advocate you have to
think about what would happen if that group were to have a negative event
and how that would effect us if we are affiliated with them.

Just my thoughts.

Sean



On 9/20/07, Ken <nuxnog at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Because of the subject matter Pat made a contribution
> to the presentation, if I recall correctly.
>
> On the subject of our affiliation, maybe it could be
> an unofficial affiliation, club-wise, even if some of
> us pay the $15/year dues. I mean, PC3 could have a
> Linux SIG which happens to be primarily populated by
> members of CharLUG, still an independent organization.
> We don't have to subordinate CharLUG to PC3, but
> rather affiliate our individual selves to the Linux
> SIG.
>
> Ken
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________=
___________
> Check out the hottest 2008 models today at Yahoo! Autos.
> http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html
> _______________________________________________
> CharLUG mailing list
> CharLUG at charlug.org
> http://charlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/charlug
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://charlug.org/pipermail/charlug/attachments/20070921/bd3f1614/att=
achment.htm